2/25/2024 0 Comments Yamaha moxf cubase tutorialĪt almost 10 minutes - it seems daunting. I hesitate to offer one of mine up against such good work. Some of your other tunes are also showing serious skills at arranging with very nice horns/brass-sections very effectively used. I also particularly liked "Perfect Match" too. Very nice mix and production suggests considerable experience at doing this. You have a great voice and a developed harmonic sense. "Blue blue Sky" especially reaches me, being the closest thing to my own style that I've ever found online. Making music is an important medicament for "Life" in all it's guises and being without the tools is not good for a musician. I hope that can get sorted soon and you can get your MOX Back. When the SW starts to "suggest" a way of working (due to way IT likes to work), then it has interfered - and that is not so good (IMO) -) I've always believed that the BEST Software (DAWs) should lurk in the background and NOT get in the way of the creative process. I suspect this reticence to USE midi this way is down to my inexperience - so the differences I feel will probably dissipate as I acquire the skills. Corrected results tend to sound less natural this way (to me).įor similar reasons, quantisation is NEVER switched on - or instated later. I'm a bit "old school" in my approach - preferring to work in audio mostly, and whilst the benefits of midi CANNOT be denied for correcting flawed performances and general tweaking, I have mostly felt "uncomfortable", reconciling the differences between a performance "as it", with a "tweaked" performance.Īs a result, I tend to be a hard taskmaster to myself, chasing that perfect performance, rather than the "correct it later in midi" approach. Yamaha's efforts have started to address this difficulty. We like to work with the original sounds we used on our various boards, and going round the midi route (lovely for editing notes and tweaking "loose" keyboard skills), it has always been demanding (IMO) to get back to those original voices, for final mix and rendering. I applaud the integration that Yamaha have achieved with the MOXF and Cubase. I wouldn't suggest you switch DAWs as you're comfortable with Reaper, but I strongly urge you to install Cubase and give it a try. In a nutshell: Using the MOX with Reaper is okay, but using it with Cubase is fantastic! You can do most of your recording work without hardly touching the mouse, and once you get used to it, the work-flow is extremely fast. You can set up controller "memories" for 50 different soft-synths, so that whenever you select an instrument in Cubase, the MOX is automatically configured to control its parameters (the ones you selected when you set it up). However, when you run this thing with Cubase it gets really good. Having said that, once you've used the VST editor in a Cubase project and seen how easy it is to control the MOX sound engine, you won't want to be without it.Ĭontrolling soft-synths in Reaper is just down to what you can do with the keyboard, mod/pitch wheels, assignable knobs & buttons, and the foot controller. There's a MOTIF template for that somewhere, can't remember where though, it's been a while. If you plan to use sounds from the MOX (and why not, it sounds bloody great ), you can set up Rea-control MIDI to select patches. Maybe when Reaper gets VST3 support it will work. The DAW transport controls don't work well with Reaper - at least I couldn't get them to work properly, and the VST editor won't work at all as it's VST3. With other DAWs, the MOX is basically an audio/MIDI interface with a keyboard and a few controllers. That level of integration (in the video) will only happen with Cubase.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |